| 57 | 0 | 337 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
在快速城市化进程中，城市历史环境面临自然侵蚀、人为破坏以及保护与发展矛盾等多重威胁，其系统稳定性与传承可持续性受到严重冲击。然而，城市历史环境遗产韧性研究尚未形成完整体系，且国内外研究维度存在差异，在评估科学性、技术应用深度等方面存在短板，凸显了该领域研究的紧迫性与必要性。文章以2004—2024年为时间跨度，选取中国知网（CNKI）与科学引文索引（WOS）数据库中的文献，借助CiteSpace软件进行知识图谱分析，系统梳理了国内外研究动态：国际研究聚焦于韧性评估、影响因素及策略，强调学科融合与技术创新；国内研究则围绕历史建筑、街区等开展实践探索。文章揭示了该领域热点的阶段性变化，阐明了从理论研究向实践应用的转型逻辑，明确了国内外研究的差异与不足，建立该领域近20年的系统研究图谱，为学术探索指明了方向，为遗产保护实践提供了决策参考，并有助于破解保护与发展之间的矛盾。
Abstract：With the rapid advancement of urbanization,urban historical environments face multiple threats such as natural erosion,human destruction,and conflicts between conservation and development,severely impacting the stability of the system and the sustainability of heritage.However,research on the resilience of urban historical environmental heritage has yet to form a comprehensive system.Differences exist in research dimensions between domestic and international studies,along with shortcomings in the scientificity of assessment and the depth of technological application,highlighting the urgency and necessity of research in this field.This paper covers the period from 2004 to 2024,selecting literature from the CNKI and WOS databases,and employs CiteSpace software for knowledge mapping analysis to systematically clarify research dynamics.International research focuses on resilience assessment,influencing factors,and strategies,emphasizing interdisciplinary integration and technological innovation,while domestic research revolves around practical explorations of historical buildings and blocks.This paper reveals phased changes in research hotspots,illustrates the logical transition from theory to practice,identifies differences and shortcomings between domestic and international research,and constructs a systematic 20-year research cartography,clarifies directions for academic exploration,provides decision-making references for heritage conservation practices,and contributes to resolving the conflict between protection and development.
[1]张兵,祝颖盈,蓝春,等.自然解:气候变化影响下的历史城市环境认知与保护规划方法[J].城市规划学刊,2024(1):18-28.
[2]戚红年,周学鹰,魏猛.韧性城市视角下历史城区产业更新路径探索：以江苏省淮安市淮安区历史城区为例[J].中国名城,2024,38(9):18-23.
[3]王苗,翁童曦,王怡雯,等.天津近代租界区历史环境保护与再生策略评价研究：以先农大院为例[J].古建园林技术,2023(6):51-55.
[4]彭亮,张春彦,王玫.社区-景区：西井峪村旅游产业转型与遗产韧性关联演变研究[J].景观设计,2025,23(4):11-13.
[5]CANTATORE E,FATIGUSO F.An energy-resilient retrofit methodology to climate change for historic districts.application in the mediterranean area[J].Sustainability,2021,13(3):1422.
[6]YUNG E,CHAN E,XU Y.Community-initiated adaptive reuse of historic buildings and sustainable development in the inner city of Shanghai[J].Journal of urban planning and development,2014,140(3):05014003.
[7]PASCHOALIN R,ISAACS N.Holistic renovation of historic and heritage buildings:Comparing New Zealand and international scenarios[J].International journal of building pathology and adaptation,2021,39(4):602-618.
[8]WANG Y,JIN C X,XU D Y,et al.Analysis of multi-dimensional layers in historic districts based on theory of the historic urban landscape:taking Shenyang Fangcheng as an example[J].Land,2024,13(11):1736.
[9]CANTATORE E,LASORELLA M,FATIGUSO F.Resilient improvement of historic districts via digital tools.The virtualization of energy retrofit actions using simplified CITYGML-based plans[C].GERVASI O,MURGANTE B,MISRA S,et al.Computational Science and Its Applications:ICCSA2021.Heidelberg,2021:155-172.
[10]ALPLER Z B,SAHIN N P,DAGLI U U.A critical discussion of industrial heritage buildings adaptive reuse as film spaces,case study:Industrial heritage buildings at Istanbul[J].Journal of architectural conservation,2020,26(3):215-234.
[11]ARBAB P,ALBORZI G.Toward developing a sustainable regeneration framework for urban industrial heritage[J].Journal of cultural heritage management and sustainable development,2022,12(3):263-274.
[12]MENG F L,XIAO X Y.Spatiotemporal distribution and adaptive reuse results assessment of beijing industrial heritage based on the sustainable renewal perspective[J].Land,2025,14(2):384.
[13]MA P F,LI X N,LAN D.A dual strategy in the adaptive reuse of industrial heritage buildings:The Shanghai west bund waterfront refurbishment[J].Buildings,2023,13(7):1582.
[14]ADIE B A,FALK M,SAVIOLI M.Overtourism as a perceived threat to cultural heritage in Europe[J].Current issues in tourism,2020,23(14):1737-1741.
[15]FIORILLO D,OFRIA F.Cultural heritage participation in Italy:the role of human and social capital[J].Journal of economic studies,2024,52(9):1-17.
[16]ASTUTI E Y,MARTOKUSUMO W,ALLAM A Z,et al.Urban Infrastructure changes and their influences on inhabitants'well-being:A case study of transcultural heritage conservation in Lasem,Indonesia[J].Heritage&Society,2024,17(3):389-412.
[17]HAMBRECHT G,ROCKMAN M.International approaches to climate change and cultural heritage[J].American antiquity,2017,82(4):627-641.
[18]XU Y B,ROLLO J,ESTEBAN Y,et al.Developing a comprehensive assessment model of social value with respect to heritage value for sustainable heritage management[J].Sustainability,2021,13(23):13373.
[19]ANDREUCCI M B.Linking future energy systems with heritage requalification in smart cities.On-going research and experimentation in the city of Trento (IT)[J].Techne,2018(S1):87-91.
[20]ALVES S,SENDRA J J.Evaluating non-intrusive energy retrofits for the built heritage of the historic centre of oporto[J].International journal of heritage architecture:Studies,repairs and maintence,2017(4):654-670.
[21]QUAGLIARINI E,CLINI P,RIPANTI M.Fast,low cost and safe methodology for the assessment of the state of conservation of historical buildings from3D laser scanning:The case study of Santa Maria in Portonovo (Italy)[J].Journal of cultural heritage,2016,24:175-183.
[22]COSIMO C,RAMÍREZ E R,Miguel F T,et al.On the use of web mapping platforms to support the seismic vulnerability assessment of old urban areas[J].Remote sensing,2022,14(6):1424.
[23]NING Z,KANGNING X,HUA X,et al.Ecological environment dynamic monitoring and driving force analysis of karst world heritage sites based on remote-sensing:A case study of Shibing Karst[J].Land,2023,12(1):184.
[24]LVY.Optimization of building thermal environment and VR industrial heritage landscape design enhanced by computer vision algorithms[J].Thermal science and engineering progress,2024,55:102926.
[25]YI J,TIAN Y,ZHAO Y.Novel approach to protect red revolutionary heritage based on artificial intelligence algorithm and image-processing technology-[J].Buildings,2024,14(9):3011.
[26]MAHDA F,DE ANDRADE B,PEREIRA R A,et al.Public participation and consensus-building in urban planning from the lens of heritage planning:A systematic literature review[J].Cities,2023,135(10):104235.
[27]ZHANG Y.The use of heritage in the place-making of a culture and leisure community:Liangzhu Culture Village in Hangzhou,China[J].International journal of heritage studies,2024,30(12):1423-1437.
[28]王苗,李博,刘浩,等.基于GIS的天津市红色文化遗产特征研究[J].景观设计,2024,22(1):26-31.
[29]易筱雅,何依,邓巍.基于社区生活圈的历史城区保护传承策略研究:以荆州古城为例[J].城市规划,2023,47(11):97-105.
[30]宋润森,陈烨,苏晨,等.空间生产视角下的城市工业遗产向文创空间转型研究:以济南市工业文创空间为例[J].城市建筑,2024,21(23):55-58.
[31]贾新新,邓鑫堉,何兴双,等.西安市三学街历史文化街区改造的文化基因识别与功能转型路径[J].现代园艺,2025,48(3):129-132.
[32]徐锡宁.城市历史景观保护的研究现状与展望[J].风景园林,2023,30(S2):56-61.
[33]喇瑞萍,郭海湘,张文凯,等.历史文化遗产的灾害综合风险评估：基于改进PSR模型的实证研究[J].安全与环境工程,2024,31(3):1-10.
[34]张智,党安荣,陈杨,等.基于数字孪生的长城文化遗产保护与传承研究[J].中国园林,2024,40(6):35-41.
[35]刘宛钦,卢漫,党新元.基于数字孪生的建筑遗产保护路径探讨[J].中国文化遗产,2024(2):32-42.
[36]刘江,韩海娟,陈铸.历史街区生态系统文化服务提升的景感设计实践框架与评价指标体系研究[J].景观设计学,2024,12(6):62-83.
基本信息:
中图分类号:TU984.114
引用信息:
[1]王苗,张艺涵,冯书馨,等.基于知识图谱的城市历史环境遗产韧性研究热点与前沿趋势分析[J].城市学报,2025,3(05):89-100.
基金信息:
国家自然科学基金(52408082)
2025-10-25
2025-10-25